Context

 

A global B2B technology company with a large, geographically distributed sales organization was undertaking a major transformation to modernize how it sold to enterprise customers. Sales teams were being asked to adopt new tools, processes, and ways of engaging customers, while leadership sought greater consistency, forecasting discipline, and productivity across regions.

​

The strategy made sense on paper, but success depended on whether sellers and managers believed the changes would actually help them win.​

 

Starting Point: Vocal Resistance and Skepticism​

 

By the time this work began, sellers were already navigating multiple, overlapping changes. Resistance was open and vocal, especially around:​

• The volume and pace of change.

• Simultaneous changes to sales compensation.

• Skepticism about the value of increased CRM data capture.​

 

Many questioned whether leaders used the data they were being asked to enter — and past experience gave them reason to doubt it. As one seller put it: “We’re being asked to change how we sell, how we plan, and how we get paid, and it’s not clear how this helps us close more business.”​

 

This was not passive resistance. It was earned skepticism rooted in risk, experience, and trust.​

 

Role and Mandate​

 

A senior communications and change leader, embedded within the sales excellence function, was asked to intervene. The initial mandate was to bring clarity to a fragmented transformation narrative, but early diagnosis showed that messaging alone was not the problem; shared understanding and belief were missing.​

 

The work began by answering the questions sellers were already asking:

• What is changing?

• Why now?

• Who does this help?

• What trade-offs are we being asked to make?​

 

That clarity became the foundation for broader change efforts.​

 

Core Intervention: Leadership Alignment Workshop​

 

As adoption lagged, it became clear that the issue was not lack of awareness at the top, but avoidance of the most difficult issues shaping seller behavior.

Rather than speculate about misalignment, the change team synthesized what they were hearing from sellers, sales managers, sales operations, and enablement. This surfaced eight recurring areas of resistance, including:​

• Concerns about compensation risk.

• The pace and layering of changes.

• Skepticism about CRM data value.

• Inconsistent executive role‑modeling.​

 

These themes were vetted with a small group of trusted senior sales leaders, who were asked to identify which issues posed the greatest adoption risk if left unaddressed. Three rose to the top, including executive misalignment and inconsistent role‑modeling. 

 

Only then was the senior sales leadership workshop convened.​ In the session, leaders saw all eight themes and were told their trusted advisors had identified three as the most critical barriers. When asked directly, they agreed — in large part because the priorities had been validated by voices they trusted.​

 

One moment proved pivotal. During discussion of CRM adoption, several leaders acknowledged they had never actually logged into and used the system themselves. The implication was immediate: sellers were being asked to capture more data in systems leaders were not visibly using, reinforcing skepticism that the data drove real decisions. Resistance to CRM adoption was reframed — not as a seller mindset problem, but as a leadership behavior gap.​

 

A concrete follow‑on action was agreed: senior leaders would participate in hands‑on CRM training focused on using data in planning, forecasting, and decision-making, so they could credibly role‑model the behaviors they expected from their teams.​

 

The workshop did not eliminate all disagreement, but it surfaced real barriers and secured leadership commitment to change behaviors — not just messages.​

 

Supporting Interventions​

 

Change Champion Networks​

A global network of more than 125 change champions was re‑launched and expanded, including a parallel group of sales managers. Champions received early visibility into upcoming changes and provided direct feedback from the field, surfacing issues early and building peer‑to‑peer credibility.​

 

Practical, Seller-Led Enablement​

Enablement was modernized to meet sellers where they worked:

• Clearer, role-specific training and communications.

• In‑tool guidance embedded directly in sales systems.

• A seller‑to‑seller video podcast focused on real experiences rather than executive messaging.​

 

These approaches helped rebuild trust and reduced reliance on top‑down directives.​

 

Measurement and Course Correction​

Dashboards tracked CRM usage, forecast accuracy, and account planning discipline. Metrics were reviewed regularly with senior leaders and used to trigger targeted interventions — not punishment — reinforcing learning and accountability.​

 

Results​

 

Over time, the organization saw measurable progress:

• Double‑digit improvements in CRM usage, forecast accuracy, and account planning.

• Increased participation in global change champion networks.

• Consistently higher engagement with transformation communications.​

 

The work was recognized with multiple internal awards, and the change leader was promoted to a director-level role based on demonstrated impact. While the broader commercial strategy continued to evolve, this work materially improved clarity, adoption, and leadership alignment during a period of sustained disruption.​

 

Lessons That Shape My Work Today​

 

This experience reinforced several enduring lessons:

• Resistance is often rational and valuable.

• Belief must be earned, not mandated.

• Leadership behavior matters more than messaging.

• Data initiatives fail when value is invisible to users.

• Alignment is a continuous process, not a one‑time event.​

 

Most importantly: effective transformation starts by taking objections seriously — and changing leadership behavior, not just frontline expectations.​

 

In my consulting work today, I draw directly on these lessons to help sales and revenue leadership teams:

• Diagnose the real, human barriers to adoption across sellers, managers, and operations.

• Design and facilitate leadership alignment sessions that confront behavior and mindset gaps, not just messaging gaps.

• Build seller‑led enablement, champion networks, and metrics that support learning instead of punitive inspection.​

 

If you are leading a complex sales transformation and see similar patterns of “earned skepticism,” this kind of approach can help rebuild trust, accelerate adoption, and make your strategy usable in the field.

Return to case studies page →